tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post6919456464962534282..comments2008-02-06T08:26:28.664-05:00World of Isaachttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17609452157635591172noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post-17530032152973909272008-02-06T08:26:00.000-05:002008-02-06T08:26:00.000-05:00I agree, Boosh.<BR/><BR/>I said the same thing to my dad right after the Santana deal went down.Timmy G, sponsored by the number 6,noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post-35961117148539521492008-02-06T07:35:00.000-05:002008-02-06T07:35:00.000-05:00Sidebar:<BR/>I hate ESPN's recent addition to the bottom line. Instead of NCAAM as the category, they will write something like "KNIGHT." They did the same thing with "SANTANA."<BR/><BR/>In my opinion, they are making individuals bigger than the game. Does it bother anyone else?Bushhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15238186523779330995noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post-11883922485109456152008-02-05T20:14:00.000-05:002008-02-05T20:14:00.000-05:00Postscript:<BR/><BR/>Excuse me, "Michigan Fan"? Yes, you're an a-wipe.<BR/><BR/>Regards, <BR/><BR/>the grammar police.the grammar police alsonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post-49231855363252357932008-02-05T20:11:00.000-05:002008-02-05T20:11:00.000-05:00You see Chris, although both "is" and "are" are present tense conjugations of the verb "be" in the indicative mood, "is"<BR/> is singular, whereas "are" is plural. In the passage cited, the player makes reference to "academics." Although he may be making reference to the general, singular practice of academia and the pursuit of academics, the collective "academics" is, in fact, plural. Therefore, the proper conjugation in that context would have been "are."<BR/><BR/>Dumbass.<BR/><BR/>"is" is the present tense singular conjugation of the verb "be," in the indicative mood, where as "are" is the present tense plural conjugation of the verb "be," in the indicativethe grammar police, back by popular demand,noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post-21045703515159828852008-02-05T19:57:00.000-05:002008-02-05T19:57:00.000-05:0014. Charles Burrell<BR/>Detroit Southeastern DB/QB <BR/><BR/>Ht.: 6-3 <BR/><BR/>Wt.: 207 <BR/><BR/>College: Michigan State <BR/><BR/>Best recruiting experience: It was when the coaches came to my school. It was like, 'It's the same guys I see on TV.' They were from different schools like Iowa, Michigan State, Michigan and Illinois. It made me feel good knowing I was appreciated. <BR/><BR/>Worst recruiting experience: All my experiences were good. <BR/><BR/>Why not U-M? I didn't receive a scholarship offer from Michigan. That was the school I always wanted to go to. It was kind of disappointing they didn't offer me. I worked real hard to receive an offer.Michigan fannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post-91579801720434278972008-02-05T18:16:00.000-05:002008-02-05T18:16:00.000-05:00re-read his quote...<BR/><BR/>when talking about academics he said <BR/><BR/>"the academics is better"<BR/><BR/>sort of ironicWorld of Isaachttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17609452157635591172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4044082373981127068.post-41444029888672240042008-02-05T17:04:00.000-05:002008-02-05T17:04:00.000-05:00I don't get it...what's wrong with choosing UofM over MSU because of academics? Isnt' UofM in the top 25-30 schools in the world? I think State was around #80.CBlusthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04563039731403259913noreply@blogger.com